Ode to E6 Part 2, Playoff standings, Tribute to my favorite MLB player
First let's start with Playoff Standings, We've reached the Final 4 and here's a surpriseI still have a perfect bracket. Let's preview the matchups shall we
<><><><><><><><><><>
Red Sox vs Yankees
Tonight Curt Schilling takes the Red Sox under his wing as the Sox fly into Yankee Stadium to face Mike Mussina and the New York Yankees. The same New York Yankees who profit from selling MLB approved merchandice that bashes the Sox. We wondered how the Yanks had so much money and allowing a team to sell shirt that say, Hey Red Sox who's your (Yankee Logo) Daddy is insane. But getting back to tonights game.
Game one as I've already said is Curt Schilling vs Mike Mussina
Game two is Pedro Martinez vs Jon Lieber
Game three is Bronson Arroyo against Kevin Brown
Game four is Time Wakefield vs Javier Vazquez
For tonights game Curt Schilling is favored by 140 at Yankee Stadium which is incredible. For those of you at home who do not understand this method of betting, if you were to bet on Curt and the Red Sox you'd put down $140 and when the Sox win then you'd win $100, if you were stupid and bet on Yanks you'd put down $100 and if for some miracle the Sox lost then you'd win $140.
Tonight at Yankee Stadium the Sox will beat the Yanks no question. Curt has always owned the Yankess and the Sox are going to go up one to nothing.
Cardinals vs Dodgers preview and Sox vs Yanks game two will be blogged tomorrow
<><><><><><><><><><>
In an instant you're here and then you're gone.
As strange as it sounds being a Baseball fan In Boston my hero growing up was Ken Caminiti. Back when I was playing baseball I copied everything he did from his pregame exercises to his stance. He was my favorite player and I almost broke into tears on Monday morning when I learned of his death by watching the Midnight Sports Center. I was in absolute shock and I couldn't believe what I was seeing and I jumped out of my bed and jumped on my computer because there is no way that he just died, the scroll on the bottom of Sports Center can't be true. I believe the first words I said when I found out that yes he was gone was holy shit, you have to be kidding me. And those were the last words I could say for a while. He will be missed by all of his fans and baseball fans in general. I was just happy that I was lucky enough to meet him at an autograph signing in Boston a few summers ago, during the All Star Break. He was honored that I learned his stance and he wondered why I'd want to learn his stance out of all stances. He will be missed and I just wish for one moment that he wouldn't have taken the drugs so he could still be alive now.
<><><><><><><><><><>
After reading my tribute if you are wondering how I could continue to do this blog, I wrote my tribue last.
Oh this is going to be good, another Ode to E6
--
Quote:
Really, you never take shots at anybody...
--
Okay, so I've never launched a personal insult at anyone on The Board.
--
Quote:
and you're never mean-spirited. HUMMM, things that make you say HUMMM
--
If you get to know me in person, you'd know that I'm not mean-spirited. I'm a nice guy, but if you press the proverbial "wrong buttons", I do get ticked off.
--
Quote:
Wow, the last time you took a shot at me would have to be on Anna's tag board but before that would have to be the shot you took in a PM at me when I was talking about the WP.com board.
--
But never a personal insult, though.
--
Quote:
How stupid do you think we are. Which sox would you be talking about, how many teams named the Sox are playing right now.
--
Not that stupid. I just have a habit of specifying which Sox it is.
--
Quote:
And a month and a half inbetween updates what the hell does that have to do with you bashing me on her board.
--
I get tired of looking at the same entry from August. I don't stick around the blog when that's the case; I just hit the "Back" button on my browser. No time to tag.
--
Quote:
...if you look at the tag board the only posts by somebody named what ever the hell your name is are the ones bashing me.
--
Well, the imposter could just figure out who SS is, and just type my name out. It's not rocket science.
--
Quote:
SS you and me have taken shots at eachother since the day I joined. don't pretend we never have,
--
But did any of those barbs include a perosnal insult? I don't think so.
--
Quote:
But then again you're probably 35 so it doesn't madder.
--
First of all, I AM 16.
--
Quote:
Talking about things that happened before you were born such as MTV debuting and this world series happening and the 1986 world series being the happiest moment of your life.
--
First of all, I read about all this stuff. That's why I know much about the 1986 World Series.
--
Quote:
HELLO you claim to be 16 now, which would have you born in 1988, 2 years after the Mets won the world series.
--
So it was a brain cramp.
--
Quote:
E6, do us all a favor and just admit it was you and then we can start to get back to normal over on wp.com...
--
What, you want me to confess to something I didn't do?
--
Quote:
...And the only person with time and motive is you E6.
--
When I'm bored (no offense to Anna) from reading the same entry on a blog for a month-and-a-half, I don't have the time to go on the tagboard.
And about motive, I don't have a motive either. On the tagboard, you asked why "I" would take a shot at you, b/c you didn't do anything to me. Exactly just that. Besides the King Size Rant, you haven't done anything to me; why would I take a shot at you?
Polygraph me on this whole incident; I'll certainly pass it.
P.S: It's still SS.
Well let's look at his arguments,
Argument A) Okay, so I've never launched a personal insult at anyone on The Board.
Really you've never launched a personal insult at anybody. Anna, Justin, Pens, Ryan, please agree that this is the funniest thing you've ever heard
Argument 2)If you get to know me in person, you'd know that I'm not mean-spirited. I'm a nice guy, but if you press the proverbial "wrong buttons", I do get ticked off.Oh so if I press the wrong buttons you get ticked off, well I'm guessing that myself and everybody else on wp.com has pushed those buttons then. You're not mean-spirited oh mercy here we go and I wouldn't want to get to know you in person, nor would anybody else on the board.
Argument 3)But never a personal insult, though.Really, hummm things that make you say hummm
Argument 4)Not that stupid. I just have a habit of specifying which Sox it is.No that is stupid, what other Sox could you be talking about now that it's MLB Playoff time, the Seahawks?
Argument 5)I get tired of looking at the same entry from August. I don't stick around the blog when that's the case; I just hit the "Back" button on my browser. No time to tag.But you did have time to tag, thus when her blog was updated you started to take shots at me on her tag board
Argument 6)Well, the imposter could just figure out who SS is, and just type my name out. It's not rocket science.Yes since we all know what your real name is, none of us really give a damn what your name really is, from now on you'll be known as E6
Argument 7)But did any of those barbs include a perosnal insult? I don't think so.Ah yeah a few of those threads I have no idea what a barbs is unless it's a BBQ, have been personal insults and you can ask anybody on WP.com and I'm sure you've also thrown a few personal insults at them.
Argument 8)First of all, I AM 16.No you're not.
Argument 9)First of all, I read about all this stuff. That's why I know much about the 1986 World Series.Yes but as your post on WP.com said,
Being at the 1986 World Series was so great seeing the Mets coming behind to beat the Red Sox. Seeing the ball go through Buckner's legs was the happiest day of my lifeAnd how many first of all's are you going to have. This point should have been second of all and a 16 year old would know this but a 26 year old wouldn't.
Argument 10)So it was a brain cramp.A brian cramp, yes because you screwed up and let all of us know that you are older than 16.
Argument 11)What, you want me to confess to something I didn't do?No you did do it.
Argument 12)When I'm bored (no offense to Anna) from reading the same entry on a blog for a month-and-a-half, I don't have the time to go on the tagboard.Well for not ever taking shots at anybody there is a slap in Anna's face. She doesn't have the benefit of being rich so godforbid she had to work and go to school and didn't have time to update her blog, is that her fault. Um NO!
Argument 13)And about motive, I don't have a motive either. On the tagboard, you asked why "I" would take a shot at you, b/c you didn't do anything to me. Exactly just that. Besides the King Size Rant, you haven't done anything to me; why would I take a shot at you?But you have taken shots at me before E6 on the board and on both boards we are members of I've taken shots at you and you've just been waiting for revenge.
Argument 14/15)Polygraph me on this whole incident; I'll certainly pass it.I would polygraph you but as we both know polygraphs don't prove anything and you can't even use them in the court of law. And second of all it isn't SS it is E6 and you will always be known as E6 from now on.
P.S: It's still SS.
That's the blog for today leave some here not on my PM's
~Chag
6 Comments:
At 5:14 PM, Anonymous said…
--
Quote:
But you did have time to tag, thus when her blog was updated you started to take shots at me on her tag board
--
I wasn't even on Anna's blog when she released her new post. I first read that on Friday.
--
Quote:
No you're not.
--
YES I AM!!!!! I have a birth certificate that says I was born in 1988. I'm telling the truth here; you don't even know me, so don't base my age on a brain cramp. You know, this is the only uncontested fact in the whole ordeal. If you really think I'm not 16, procure a birth certificate saying that I'm older than 16.
--
Quote:
This point should have been second of all and a 16 year old would know this but a 26 year old wouldn't
--
No, I screwed up and it was a brain cramp brought on by excitment.
--
Quote:
No you did do it.
--
How would you know? Where are the rock-solid facts? What you're mostly bringing up is circumstantial evidence.
--
Quote:
would polygraph you but as we both know polygraphs don't prove anything and you can't even use them in the court of law.
--
Well, what about circumstantial evidence? It's not a sure-fire way of proving anyhting, either.
-
Quote:
Well for not ever taking shots at anybody there is a slap in Anna's face. She doesn't have the benefit of being rich so godforbid she had to work and go to school and didn't have time to update her blog, is that her fault. Um NO!
--
I'm not blaimng anyone. The point of "the long time between updates" remark, was not to take a shot at anybody. The point of it was to prove I had no time to go on the tagboard. And isn't it funny that you're the one that's brigning up irrelevant stuff, when you're the one that tried to tell me my arguments were irrelevant?
--
Quote:
That's the blog for today leave some here not on my PM's
--
Chag, I don't have a blog account, I didn't know that you enabled Anonymous posts up until now.
At 5:27 PM, Anonymous said…
--
Quote:
Well for not ever taking shots at anybody there is a slap in Anna's face. She doesn't have the benefit of being rich so godforbid she had to work and go to school and didn't have time to update her blog, is that her fault. Um NO!
--
That's why I stopped checking on her blog for a while - When I keep seeing the entry from August 28, I assumed she's busy. It wasn't meant to be a diss, my "one-and-a-half-month between updates" argument was to prove I had no time to tag.
At 5:28 PM, Anonymous said…
--
Quote:
And second of all it isn't SS it is E6 and you will always be known as E6 from now on.
--
I didn't take that shot at you to earn the tithle of "E6", thus, I refuse to recognize that as a moniker for me.
At 5:51 PM, Anonymous said…
--
Quote:
And how many first of all's are you going to have. This point should have been second of all and a 16 year old would know this but a 26 year old wouldn't.
A brian cramp, yes because you screwed up and let all of us know that you are older than 16.
--
Chag, stop taking things out of context. It was an honest mistake on my part.
At 8:52 PM, ~Chaggy said…
For somebody who doesn't have, a lot of time, has a lot of time to respond to my blog. And continues to prove my points for me.
At 9:07 PM, Anonymous said…
Quote:
For somebody who doesn't have, a lot of time, has a lot of time to respond to my blog. And continues to prove my points for me.
--
Not really. The only reason why I had time to respond to your blog is because some of these accusations are false. The reason why I don't have time anywhere else in the day to post on blogs, is becuase I have schoolwork to do.
And I haven't proved any points. First of all, I don't see rock-solid proof of how I can be older than 16.
--
Quote:
A brian cramp, yes because you screwed up and let all of us know that you are older than 16.
--
You think I'm older than 16 just becasue of that comment? First of all, I AM 16, and second of all, you're just twisting my words, and taking some of my statements out of context. Whatever happened to "benefit of the doubt"?
Post a Comment
<< Home