Ode to E6 Part 3, Playoff standings,

First let's go with a Who Knew, sponcered by WB Mason.
Who Knew? The head trainers for three of the four remaining playoff teams graduated from Springfield College: Boston's Jim Rowe (class of '87), Houston's Dave LaBoissiere ('74), and Barry Weinberg ('73) of the Cardinals .
<><><><><><><><><><>
So a springfield trainers World Series has to happen so the Sox have to beat the yanks
<><><><><><<><><><>
Cardinals Playoff Preview:
Tonight on FX in everywhere across the country, except for the St. Louis and Houston market, will see Woody Williams square off against Brandon Backe.
Thursday Matt Morris will take the hill to square off against Pete Munro
Saturday is the game I'm looking forward to as Jeff Suppan will face Roger Clemens
Sunday Jason Marquis will face Roy Oswalt
<><><><><><><><><><>
This will be a long tough hard series but I can see the 'Stros winning it and yes that would go against a lot since we know that I'm a Cardinals fan but my original pick at the start of this season was Houston vs the Red Sox.
<><><><><><><><><><>
Red Sox Recap;
Incase you were living under a rock you'd know that the Red Sox squared off against the Evil Empire last night. The only thing that thankfully they didn't do with that starwars opening, I was expecting Darth Vader (George S.) to be looking at Luke (Pedro M.) and Say, Pedro I am your father. And that would have been horrible. But the Sox didn't look that bad, no I know you're screming right now that John they lost but listen they were held perfect for 6.1 innings, that's 19 straight batters before Mark "Mr. K" Bellhorn got a hit that sparked a rally for 5 runs. All the Sox runs came with 2 outs last night, and Mueller almost had a Deja vu and the nation would have errupted. But tonight Pedro Martinez goes up against Jon Lieber.

And for the gambler here are tonight's odds;
Boston is favored by 140 and the Cardinals are favored by a whopping 250.
<><><><><><><><><><>
And let's have ode to E6 part 3.

I swear E6 doesn't learn, he keeps digging a bigger hole for himself. Here we go with another Ode to E6
<><><><><><><><><><>

--
Quote:
But you did have time to tag, thus when her blog was updated you started to take shots at me on her tag board
--

I wasn't even on Anna's blog when she released her new post. I first read that on Friday.

--
Quote:
No you're not.
--

YES I AM!!!!! I have a birth certificate that says I was born in 1988. I'm telling the truth here; you don't even know me, so don't base my age on a brain cramp. You know, this is the only uncontested fact in the whole ordeal. If you really think I'm not 16, procure a birth certificate saying that I'm older than 16.

--
Quote:
This point should have been second of all and a 16 year old would know this but a 26 year old wouldn't
--

No, I screwed up and it was a brain cramp brought on by excitment.

--
Quote:
No you did do it.
--

How would you know? Where are the rock-solid facts? What you're mostly bringing up is circumstantial evidence.

--
Quote:
would polygraph you but as we both know polygraphs don't prove anything and you can't even use them in the court of law.
--

Well, what about circumstantial evidence? It's not a sure-fire way of proving anyhting, either.

-
Quote:
Well for not ever taking shots at anybody there is a slap in Anna's face. She doesn't have the benefit of being rich so godforbid she had to work and go to school and didn't have time to update her blog, is that her fault. Um NO!
--

I'm not blaimng anyone. The point of "the long time between updates" remark, was not to take a shot at anybody. The point of it was to prove I had no time to go on the tagboard. And isn't it funny that you're the one that's brigning up irrelevant stuff, when you're the one that tried to tell me my arguments were irrelevant?

--
Quote:
That's the blog for today leave some here not on my PM's
--

Chag, I don't have a blog account, I didn't know that you enabled Anonymous posts up until now.

Shall we break down the arguments just made by E6;

I wasn't even on Anna's blog when she released her new post. I first read that on Friday.

Who cares, we know that you did it

YES I AM!!!!! I have a birth certificate that says I was born in 1988. I'm telling the truth here; you don't even know me, so don't base my age on a brain cramp. You know, this is the only uncontested fact in the whole ordeal. If you really think I'm not 16, procure a birth certificate saying that I'm older than 16.

And I have an ID that says I'm 21 what's your point. You can make those ID's and birth certificates so easily.

No, I screwed up and it was a brain cramp brought on by excitment.

Oh that's what you call it nowadays a brain cramp.

How would you know? Where are the rock-solid facts? What you're mostly bringing up is circumstantial evidence.

You're right I wouldn't know that you're actually 26 but by bringing up things that happened before you were "born" hints at it.

I'm not blaimng anyone. The point of "the long time between updates" remark, was not to take a shot at anybody. The point of it was to prove I had no time to go on the tagboard. And isn't it funny that you're the one that's brigning up irrelevant stuff, when you're the one that tried to tell me my arguments were irrelevant?

Chag, I don't have a blog account, I didn't know that you enabled Anonymous posts up until now.

Yet he doesn't take shots at anybody and here is a shot at me.
<><><><><><><><><><>

--
Quote:
Well for not ever taking shots at anybody there is a slap in Anna's face. She doesn't have the benefit of being rich so godforbid she had to work and go to school and didn't have time to update her blog, is that her fault. Um NO!
--

That's why I stopped checking on her blog for a while - When I keep seeing the entry from August 28, I assumed she's busy. It wasn't meant to be a diss, my "one-and-a-half-month between updates" argument was to prove I had no time to tag.

Well something told you to go and check her blog and start to bash me E6 didn't it. And if you have no time to Tag yet you have time to bash me through PM's and my comment pages.
<><><><><><><><><><>

--
Quote:
And second of all it isn't SS it is E6 and you will always be known as E6 from now on.
--

I didn't take that shot at you to earn the tithle of "E6", thus, I refuse to recognize that as a moniker for me.

Well isn't that too bad, you will always be known as E6 by me and a few other members of wp.com and the Baseball Party
<><><><><><><><><><>

Quote:
And how many first of all's are you going to have. This point should have been second of all and a 16 year old would know this but a 26 year old wouldn't.

A brian cramp, yes because you screwed up and let all of us know that you are older than 16.
--

Chag, stop taking things out of context. It was an honest mistake on my part.

How is it out of context, that is exactly what you said, I posted the PM as it was so it's not out of context.
<><><><><><><><><><>

Quote:
For somebody who doesn't have, a lot of time, has a lot of time to respond to my blog. And continues to prove my points for me.
--

Not really. The only reason why I had time to respond to your blog is because some of these accusations are false. The reason why I don't have time anywhere else in the day to post on blogs, is becuase I have schoolwork to do.

And I haven't proved any points. First of all, I don't see rock-solid proof of how I can be older than 16.

--
Quote:
A brian cramp, yes because you screwed up and let all of us know that you are older than 16.
--

You think I'm older than 16 just becasue of that comment? First of all, I AM 16, and second of all, you're just twisting my words, and taking some of my statements out of context. Whatever happened to "benefit of the doubt"?

Well school work is less important than my blog, E6 I'm honored that you honor my blog that much. Any rock solid proof that you're older than 16, your post on wp.com that states and I quote,

Being at the 1986 World Series was so great seeing the Mets coming behind to beat the Red Sox. Seeing the ball go through Buckner's legs was the happiest day of my life

Explain yourself E6, we're dying to hear what you have to say.
<><><><><><><><><><>
And yet after saying I wasn't going to listen to anymore PM's and in a move that surprised NOBODY I got a PM last night,

Chaggy, look. It's obvious that we both stongly believe in our contentions, you believing that I posted an insult about you on the tag board, and me contending that I didn't do it; that it was an imposter.

- I'm 110% sure I'm innocent, but you're not buying a thing that I say.

- You believe that I did it, but I'm not going to confess to something that I did.

Nobody's going to budge. Why don't we just agree to disagree over the matter and move on? I want this over as much as you do.

Circumstantial evidence is not a sure-fire way to determine whether or not I took that shot at you on the tagbord. But you don't believe any of my testimony, either. Rather than arguing over an insult, let's just say we both agree to disagree on whether or not I took the shot, rather than airing out other things over your blog.

I wilI realize that I have taken shots at you in the past, from the incident about [MUTE] up a post, to the PM regarding the King-Size Rant. So I was wrong to say that I never took a shot at anyone. Heat of the moment, I tend to forget some of my previous actions on the board. But honestly, I don't remember taking any personal insults at you. If I did take any cheap shots at you on the board, I apologize for that.

Wow wait a second, that last paragraph he said that he took shots at me in the past then he says that he didn't. So now we're getting conflicting reports. And I'm not the only one who's not agreeing with your testimony, but I'm the judge, jury and executioner so you're guilty as charged. And now he's saying that he was wrong and that he did take shots at people in the heat of the moment, while a few days ago he said that he never would. Let's just wait a few days and then he'll come clean and say that well yeah I did that on anna's tag board and Chag I'm sorry that i didn't admit to it. And I believe that yes that [mute] post how can I forget that, since because of the bashing war we got in I GOT A STRIKE, BECAUSE OF YOU! So E6, and now he's trying to tell me how to run and operate my award winning blog, E6 just stop you've already dug a hole big enough for your ego so you can stop digging, if you keep going another inch you're going to hit the center of the earth.
<><><><><><><><><><>
That's the blog for today, Red Sox recap tomorrow and Cardinals preview and maybe an Ode to E6 part 4? We'll have to see

~Chag